Hi all,
My wife and I are going to spend the whole of September in the USA, of which 3 weeks in California. I will stay an extra week or two after she's gone, and I would like to find one, or maybe two, places (National Parks or any type of protected areas) where I could make a multi-day trek (anything from 5 to 10 days).
I would like to trek in full autonomy (will carry tent and supplies), and my focus would be mainly on photography (although I'm also interested in wildlife, birds in particular).
I am almost certain that I will drop off my wife in SF (although LA is a possibility, or maybe even Las Vegas), since this is where we'll start and rent an RV. At the end of my trip I will return home from one of those three places, or maybe even push up to Phoenix or Denver, as I do have more flexibility. When on my own, I wasn't planning on renting a vehicle, and was gonna rely on public transport (?) to get to and back from the trails, but I've just had a very quick look at the forum it seems like people recommend renting.
Is it actually doable to reach a tailhead from the city, and then go back (to the same or another city), by public transport? It seems a bit wasteful to rent a car if I'm then going to leave it parked for the duration of my trek - and it would also mean that I have to make a loop.
A good choice of places to visit would mean minimizing the hassle and the lenght of travel to and from the parks, and to the departure airport.
Looking at the map in my LP I see a cluster of parks either side of Las Vegas - Yosemite, Kings Canyon, Sequoia and Death Valley to the west, Grand Canyon, Zion, Bryce, Canyonlands and Arches to the east - but I've no idea which of those might be best suited, both logistically, and considering what I'm after. There might also be plenty of lesser-known equally nice and possibly easier to reach, or closer to my start and finish point.
What would you suggest?
Thanks,
Nick

