Enter custom title (optional)
This topic is locked
Last reply was
3.8k

Going down to CA and maybe into SA for a few months with a couple or few months of volunteering. World Nomads seems fine and I know that many people have had good experiences with it from the posts on this board. But since I am not planning to do any hardcore adventure stuff, it seems that I don't really need to pay for the extra cost to be covered for those activities.

I have emailed them and they responded quickly, and they do not cover the cost for me to replace a "lost" passport which Travel Guard does. It is unlikely, but if I'm buying insurance for travel, this seems pretty basic to me. Neither cover any cash lost.

With Travel Guard the medical coverage is much higher than World Nomads, but the policy itself is cheaper. I did read through both of their "fine print"(which in all honesty, only 70% of it makes clear sense) and I'm more inclined to go with Travel Guard.

So, what is you experience with either or both of these insurers?

have you filed claims with them from abroad? Was it easy? Did they pay with no hassle?

Report
1

what country are you from?

Travel gaurd is a us company so it is what I use I filed a claim for travel delay once and they pay no problem. world nomads is from uk and since most of rtw's are not american that is the company you hear about the most. I am inclined to go with travel gaurd.

Report
2

Yes I live in the US. Thanks for the feedback!

Report
3

World Nomads is actually an Australian company I believe.

Check how they both deal with a claim while 'away'. Some insurance requires you to pay for say a doctor's bill up front and then claim when you return home. The same for any kind of claim. This does not suit someone who will be away for an extended period of time and so becomes an important issue to check on.

Also, if there is any possibility you might extend your inital plans, check on whether extending your coverage while 'away' can be done. Not all allow this.

Finally, as an American it is important for you to maintain your coverage at home if at all possible. If you do not and apply for insurance when you return, you will find it a problem if you have contracted or been diagnosed while away with any kind of ongoing medical problem. You will be unlikely to get coverage for what then becomes a 'pre-existing condition[.

Example, you are in SA and contract some disease. Your travel medical insurance covers you for doctor/hospital visits while away but eventually you return home. If you then apply to say Cobra for coverage in the US, they will not cover that 'pre-existing condition' and of course your travel coverage ends once you get off the plane in the USA.

Countries like the UK, Canada or Australia, where government coverage exists, do not have this problem.

Report
4

traleinginstyle46 Maybe you have not heard but in the US here we have something new it is called obama care the pre exsisting conditions are now a thing of the past many other things are no problem any more too, ah well some things change this year and well some will change in 2014 oh no well maybe with the court chalanges and everything. no one really knows.

to maintain coverage in the US you could switch to a super high deductabel for however long you where gone. then lower on your return

Report
5

Have had some issues with World Nomads which you can find if you do a search. If you have read all the fine print and feel from that that the other insurer is better, I'd go with that one.

Report
6

I've used Travel Guard in the past (but only for vacation trips less than a month in duration) - and I've had to file a claim with them. They were excellent to deal with, and paid the claim promptly. As long as their policy meets your travel needs, I'd recommend them without hesitation.

Report
7

I recently made full use of the insurance I purchased through World Nomads--I was evacuated by helicopter while trekking in Nepal and spent six days in the hospital in Kathmandu. I had a mixed experience, and though I cannot recommend them, I don't know that any other companies are better. The actual servicer for our plan was Access America; I believe World Nomads has recently changed carriers, and who you are insured with may depend on where you live. Keep in mind that it won't be World Nomads you're talking to if you have a claim, so the knowledge and customer service of the actual insurance carrier will determine your experience. Definitely do your research and read the fine print carefully.

Bad experiences with World Nomads: We were unable to make an international collect call from Nepal, and had to use a satellite phone at about $1.25/minute. The first time we called, after going through a phone tree, we were transferred to AAA roadside assistance (WTF?). The second time, we were told they had no record of us in their system (double WTF?). Finally, after being put on hold for 20 minutes, we were connected to a nurse whose best advice was "go to a doctor" (we were four days away from the nearest city at that point).

A couple of days later, after I miraculously did find a Nepalese doctor who told me I needed an evacuation, we were unable to make an international call to the insurance company (not their fault). We had to contact the U.S. Embassy in Kathmandu, who took our insurance info and contacted the company to coordinate the evac. Numerous phone calls were required to organize the evac (luckily the owner of the tea house where we were staying allowed us to receive calls on her cell phone, though service was spotty). The agents we were working with clearly did not have a clue about where we were, since they kept asking us to fax them stuff (this is a TRAVEL insurance company, right?), and even the Embassy commented that they didn't get it. After about 24 hours, they were finally able to arrange a helicopter (OK in my case, but an unacceptable delay in a life-threatening situation). Once I was at the hospital, we also had problems getting them to authorize payment to the hospital in a timely manner. In fact, I basically spent an extra day in the hospital just waiting for them to respond so that the hospital would discharge me (in the end, my husband had to leave his passport as collateral and go back the next day to run interference between the insurance company and the hospital in order to get my bill paid).

Since getting home, we have filed a claim for additional medical expenses we opted to pay out of pocket rather than waiting ages for them to approve it, as well as claims made under the trip interruption clause. We have not heard anything back yet.

Good experiences: They paid for the helicopter and my hospital bill up front (good thing, cause the total ran to more than $60,000). I worry they may try to get something off our home medical insurance, who will turn around and ask us to pay a portion, but so far that has not happened.

If you will be traveling to remote areas in a developing country, especially Nepal, you might be interested in the extensive advice we compiled on our blog about what to bring and do in case of medical emergencies.

Report
8

It never ceases to amaze me how people can enter into a contract and then complain when the terms of the contract are invoked.

"World nomad has many ridiculous clauses and exclusions to prevent you from making basic claims." Really, Wmisbad? In whose opinion are they ridiculous? If you read a policy and it says X and then you decide to go ahead and buy that policy, are you suggesting you are in the habit of buying something ridiculous in order to be able to complain about it later?

" Additionally, they expect you to claim first with your travel provider for travel cancellation before you can claim with them. Seriously ridiculous. " Again, really Wmisbad? That is a standard clause that I think you will find in pretty much any (if not all) travel insurance policies that cover travel cancellations. What exactly then is ridiculous about it?

Almost invariably, when you read any complaints about insurance (such as those you linked to) it is someone complaining about something that is in the terms and conditions of the policy they bought. Example: 'My camera cost $600 3 years ago but I only got $150 when I claimed.' Well wow, it ain't worth $600 today and your policy clearly states it will be depreciated accordingly. If you wanted REPLACEMENT insurance why didn't you buy that?

The fact is, most people don't READ their policy and then complain when what IS covered is not what they THOUGHT was covered. I have no sympathy for stupidity. Any insurance company pays out what they have agreed to pay out, but no more than that.

Abramo shows us why you buy insurance. " They paid for the helicopter and my hospital bill up front (good thing, cause the total ran to more than $60,000)." Complaining about nickel and dime things that aren't covered by the policy or expecting it to cover every little thing under the sun is laughable. READ the policy.

Report
Pro tip
Lonely Planet
trusted partner