Yeah, Vinny, but Merriam-Webster’s Dictionary supports the usage as a subordinating conjunction since Old English.
But does it deny usage as a preposition? Always a good idea to see what the primary source actually says, especially when it is so easily to hand.
than: preposition
:in comparison with
After 200 years of innocent if occasional use, the preposition than was called into question by 18th century grammarians. Some 200 years of elaborate reasoning have led to these present-day inconsistent conclusions: than whom is standard but clumsy (T. S. Eliot, than whom nobody could have been more insularly English — Anthony Burgess); than me may be acceptable in speech (a man no mightier than thyself or me — Shakespeare) (why should a man be better than me because he's richer than me — William Faulkner, in a talk to students); than followed by a third-person objective pronoun (her, him, them) is usually frowned upon. Surveyed opinion tends to agree with these conclusions. Our evidence shows that than is used as a conjunction more commonly than as a preposition, that than whom is chiefly limited to writing, and that me is more common after the preposition than the third-person objective pronouns. In short, you can use than either as a conjunction or as a preposition.
First Known Use of THAN
1560
Edited by: iviehoff
Edited by: iviehoff to fix formatting

