Enter custom title (optional)
This topic is locked
Last reply was
1.9k
10

OP, that's a very "posh" concern of your friends.
It all depends on circumstances.
It made me think of my recent hike to Machu Picchu. Already, after the first day, all nine of us, complete strangers from five countries, age 20-54, gathered in a tent, sharing snacks from a plastic bowl and passing a bottle of whiskey around, no glasses. It was dark and freezing cold outside, and there was no water to wash your hands after having a pee.

Report
11

When you bring the large tin of toffee popcorn to work, also bring a mug or food scoop that people can use to fill a coffee-filter paper bowl. Keeps clean hands from getting sticky, and discourages dirty hands from touching everything.


Take your initial estimate, double that and add 20 percent.
It always takes more time and money than you think it should.
Report
12

<blockquote>Quote
<hr>The rationale being that someone's urine stained hand could contaminate the entire batch.<hr></blockquote>
Contaminate it with what?

Report
13

yeah, there's some truth to it, bowls of peanuts in bars have been analysed and lord-knows-how-many samples of pee have been found on them thanks to those who don't wash.

IMO, it's one to file under paranoia, however.

Report
14

My neighborhood bar provides little bowls of peanuts or snacks to each patron, then discards them when said patron leaves. They also have drinking straws that are wrapped in plastic in such a way that the bartender snaps off the bottom portion of the wrap and inserts the straw into the glass without ever touching it. Paranoid, in my opinion.

Report
15

#12 - I agree about the stereotype, and offered up the suggestion only to encourage OP to bring in the great treats. I personally have no worries about the shared dried snacks dish in an office or small party group. At a restaurant or bar, thought, I want to only share food with people I know.


Take your initial estimate, double that and add 20 percent.
It always takes more time and money than you think it should.
Report
16

E-Boi, yeah, double dipping's an issue. If possible I try to take the food item and turn it around end dip the unbitten side into the dip. It's easy w/ like a breadstick but not as easy w/ shrimp.

Midwesterner, now that you mention it my mom used to do that when she had her girlfriends over. She'd pour bridge mix into a gravy boat (or something that looked like it) and they'd ladle out the mix onto a cocktail napkin. I totally forgot about that.

Report
17

ManchVegas, I believe that trick of your mother's was less about the ladies pawing through the shared bridge mix, and more about comfort. I.e., with individual portions, they didn't have to hunch over the common bowl.

Report
18

Yeah, they were just being girly girls probably. It's funny because you don't see a lot of females grab handfuls of stuff and shove it into their mouths (well, in public anyway) . It must be considered "un-ladylike".

Report
19

You are right, ManchVegas ~~ we girls are trained from infancy to squelch those kinds of impulses. Everyone knows that otherwise the world would be subjected to the sight of women walking around with open boxes of bridge mix, dumping the stuff straight down their gullets.

Report
Pro tip
Lonely Planet
trusted partner