Copy of my post from the other thread:
hostels in Noosa and Sunshine Coast having an internationals only polcy
While at face value it could look discriminatory, there is definitely a range of conflicting uses and expectations of hostels, and where they do clash, it can lead to a disappointing experience, especially for the genuine backpacker.
Hostels can be used for all these:
- international travellers who seek a couple of nights
- Australian travellers seeking the same
- backpackers there longer term (working during their WHV)
- in some regions, hostels specifically for fruit-pickers
- cheap (on-going) accommodation for "fairly normal" Australians, who might well be working
- cheap (on-going) accommodation for derros, druggies, and the otherwise feral homeless
These multiple uses can cause real problems ... live and let live can only take you so far. We've stayed in hostels where the "permanents" dominate conversation, the TVs, the kitchen, the pool table, etc. It sucks and can be really unpleasant.
I can see why hostel owners want none of that ... fill the place with Danes or Japanese for a couple of nights only, and make much more out of them through the bar and the tours!
Seems to me the best solution (rather than a blanket locals ban) is to have a night-limit (3, 5 ,7 per quarter, whatever), except in those regional hostels specifically serving the fruit-pickers doing their 90 days of work.

