Grrrrrrrr

<blockquote>Quote
<hr>The poster "balthasar" is a known troll, he repeatedly posts provocative topics so he can watch the replies. This one was especially lame. He has used this "unfit for dogs" complaint several times.<hr></blockquote>I did, did I? And Balthasar is a "known troll"?
I challenge you to produce these posts in which I used this "unfit for dogs" complaint several times. I guarantee you won't find any, simply because they do not exist.
Contrary to you, I'm a serious poster, asking relevant questions. Or at least, they are relevant to me. In your view, posts about the American War in Vietnam may be provocative. In my view, they are not. And if above post disturbs you, you could at least try and find out why I put it up in the first place. There's a reason for everything, even if it escapes your observation.
You have the right to disagree, but if you can manage, a certain degree of reticence would be appropriate.

Yes, thought as much. Two days later, and Mookie has been around (see below) but hasn't produced the requested proof of his allegation. In my book, this guy is an intrigante, nothing more, and certainly nothing less.
Get lost, you worthless piece of crap.
First Name: Mookie
Last Name:
Username: mrmookie
Country: Vietnam
Website: http://<BR>Message Posts: 8728
Joined: Fri June 07, 2002 12:50 PM
Last Visited On: Fri April 20, 2007 8:27 AM

Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary -
Intrigante
Intrigante", n. [F.]
A female intriguer!?! (hmmmm..., then again, he did once mention something about a red Ao Dai!!)
msmookie! he!