#39 ... from your earlier post... "Delta packs you like sardines now and the flight attendants at PAL were friendlier and more attentive. PAL have .... the in flight entertainment system"... Yes an excellent, non emotional and unbiased assessment of how a PAL cabin crew are likely to react in an emergency... " You'll be telling us next that average age, FAA mandated training, experience and salary have nothing to do with effective emergency response between airlines such as Delta and PAL. Spare us...
In many hundreds of flights with Asian airlines over the years (including PAL) I've seen their own safety rules violated, poor attitudes from supervisors who should know better and cabin crews not even in control of their passengers. This does not bode well for their ability to act correctly in the event of an emergency. The same attitudes do not generally exist in airlines such as Qantas, Cathay, ANA, KLM, United, Lufthansa, BA and many others - or Delta. Cos if they did the cabin crew would be fired...
I once landed in Singapore on PAL and as the aircraft was taxi-ing to the gate, stopping several hundred yards away for some reason, and with the seat belt signs still illuminated dozens of passengers with their baggage proceeded to crowd the aisles intent on somehow getting off.... not sure how... Guess what the cabin crew did? Nothing... not a thing... Nor did the captain even bother to explain the reason for the 10 minute delay or instruct passengers to take their seats. But the flight was over an hour late getting in so I guess the passengers had pretty much seen enough... This nonsense is not unique to PAL, but I've seen enough to have an insight into how different airlines rank safety. Of course it's Number 1?.. Nonsense.
As I said to the OP, PAL are OK, nothing special. On a good day I'd rate them average, on a bad day, as poor as it can get... They were banned from flying to Europe for several years, not sure why, but I'm happy they've resumed that service and hope they can expand further. They were a better airline 30 years ago. They went through a dreadful patch in the 90's and are genuinely trying hard to match their neighbours in Singapore, Hong Kong and Thailand but have a long way to go. Budget carriers such as Cebu Pacific and Air Asia have taken away a huge chunk of PAL's potential customer base short haul and the Gulf carriers are screwing them on long haul routes. Given the enormous growth in passenger numbers to and from the Philippines over the past 30 years, 12 million OFW's for a start, PAL should have a larger percentage of the MNL passenger and freight traffic. The reason they don't is that they're not very well run - and other airlines are.