I'm in the final stages of completing my draft itinerary containing three Central Asia countries, i.e. Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Uzbekistan. After I have done most of my job regarding Kazakhstan, I have to do something with Kyrgyzstan too. For the time being, I have two questions on my mind and I hope that our forum members will help me to resolve them.
-
On my route from Karakol toward the western part of Kyrgyzstan, I will pass along Issyk-Kul lake. To be honest, this lake was and it still is the number one reason for introducing Kyrgyzstan in my itinerary. So, I would like to know which shore of the lake is more attractive regarding the viewpoints, the authentic villages and life of local inhabitants, natural landscape, natural attractions, etc. I'm well aware that one mentioned detail could be better on the northern, while other detail could be better on the southern shore, but if the result is a draw, my preference goes toward natural attractions. I know that my question is probably an everlasting dilemma, but I would really like to hear your suggestions.
-
I have one more lake in mind. This is Song Kul lake. I find it rather remote, but also attractive. Please, is this lake worthy visiting after I have, let's say, explored Issyk-Kul lake? I understand that along the shores of Song Kul lake there are no permanent settlements and that the water is the cleanest possible, so there are the differences between the two lakes, but are the views of the lake and natural attractions really so different than those encountered along Issyk-Kul? Is this lake really an attraction not to be missed while in Kyrgyzstan?
Thanks for your kind suggestions, opinions and whatever do you plan to write regarding my dilemmas.
