I’m looking to get from San Francisco to Seattle and Olympic National Park and have two different options in mind; either drive the PCH south over around 3 days (is this long enough to take in all the stops and do a bit of hiking on the way?), spend a couple of days in San Diego and then fly from either San Diego or LA to Seattle, or drive north from San Francisco, taking a day in Shasta Trinity national forest and a full day at Crater lake, then heading up the Oregon/Washington coast, probably to Olympic National Park first rather than Seattle.
Given that my priorities are to take the journey slowly and spend a decent amount of time hiking rather than being in a car for 10 hours per day, which option sounds better? Ultimately I’ve heard/read that the south California coast is unparalleled; how does the Oregon coast compare, and does the greater variety of national/state parks in NoCal and Oregon justify missing out on the SoCal coast? Unfortunately I can’t incorporate both stretches into one journey!
tl;dr NoCal/OR coast + Crater Lake or PCH from SF to LA?
Any advice on either of these options would be greatly appreciated! Thanks!
