Print

krodger200:07 UTC24 Oct 2008

We are planning on either spending some time in Parque Manu in Peru, or in Parque Madidi in Bolivia. Our Lonely Planet says that both parks offer tons of beautiful wildlife and are fabulous. Does anyone have any idea which is better? Madidi is definitely harder to get to, but we would be willing to go if its truly worth the trouble. More than anything, we are interested in seeing the most animals. Thanks for any advice,

Katie

bassmaster_s23:14 UTC29 Oct 2008

Hi!
We went to the jungle in Parque Madidi last week. My brother was in Manu, and it was really worth he said. Madidi is much cheaper, and we really enjoyed it. If you want to visit Madidi, you have to go to Rurrenabaque, a town on the river Beni. From there on, you can also do tours to the Pampa, where you can see lots of animals (it's hard not to see them), but thats more touristic. In the jungle there are less animals, but it's nicer to see them because it's hard...
We did both tours with Fluvial tours, for 500 Bs. each. We did not really enjoy the "eco-tourism" approach of our guide of the Pampa tour (Fernando, El Mejicano). For example: he pulled an anaconda out of his hole in the tree, only to show it to us... I did not really like this... Our guide in the jungle was really good: he really was in love with nature, Juan Carlos is his name!

Conclusion: want to see animals (crocodiles, turtles, even some pink river dolphin, if you're lucky an anaconda): go to the pampa, but close your eyes for tourism (there is even a bar on the river bank), want to enjoy nature and hear (and sometimes see) animals: go to the jungle

greets,
Samuel

erik0723:38 UTC30 Oct 2008

This thread "Parque Manu or Parque Manini" (= Madidi) was posted double by a mistake. Both threads were posted 24-Oct-2008 11:07 with the same question, identically.
The ID's (Identification #) of the two threads are 1684839 and 1684840.

Until the above reply # 1 of 30-Oct-2008 all replies have been posted in 'the other thread', ID 1684840.
And this thread (ID 1684839) was just an 'empty' duplicate.

So, to see more replies to the question, go to the mentioned namesake thread, also from 24-Oct-2008:
http://www.lonelyplanet.com/thorntree/thread.jspa?threadID=1684840
Up to now with 4 replies.

Parque Manu or Parque Manini Country forums / South America / Bolivia
krodger200:07 UTC24 Oct 2008	We are planning on either spending some time in Parque Manu in Peru, or in Parque Madidi in Bolivia. Our Lonely Planet says that both parks offer tons of beautiful wildlife and are fabulous. Does anyone have any idea which is better? Madidi is definitely harder to get to, but we would be willing to go if its truly worth the trouble. More than anything, we are interested in seeing the most animals. Thanks for any advice, Katie
bassmaster_s23:14 UTC29 Oct 2008	Hi! We went to the jungle in Parque Madidi last week. My brother was in Manu, and it was really worth he said. Madidi is much cheaper, and we really enjoyed it. If you want to visit Madidi, you have to go to Rurrenabaque, a town on the river Beni. From there on, you can also do tours to the Pampa, where you can see lots of animals (it's hard not to see them), but thats more touristic. In the jungle there are less animals, but it's nicer to see them because it's hard... We did both tours with Fluvial tours, for 500 Bs. each. We did not really enjoy the "eco-tourism" approach of our guide of the Pampa tour (Fernando, El Mejicano). For example: he pulled an anaconda out of his hole in the tree, only to show it to us... I did not really like this... Our guide in the jungle was really good: he really was in love with nature, Juan Carlos is his name! Conclusion: want to see animals (crocodiles, turtles, even some pink river dolphin, if you're lucky an anaconda): go to the pampa, but close your eyes for tourism (there is even a bar on the river bank), want to enjoy nature and hear (and sometimes see) animals: go to the jungle greets, Samuel	1
erik0723:38 UTC30 Oct 2008	This thread "Parque Manu or Parque Manini" (= Madidi) was posted double by a mistake. Both threads were posted 24-Oct-2008 11:07 with the same question, identically. The ID's (Identification #) of the two threads are 1684839 and 1684840. Until the above reply # 1 of 30-Oct-2008 all replies have been posted in 'the other thread', ID 1684840. And this thread (ID 1684839) was just an 'empty' duplicate. So, to see more replies to the question, go to the mentioned namesake thread, also from 24-Oct-2008: http://www.lonelyplanet.com/thorntree/thread.jspa?threadID=1684840 Up to now with 4 replies.	2