Thorn Tree travel forum

Nepal teen buddha

Replies: 407 - Last Post: 23-Jan-2008 22:14 Last Post By: jak_dafool

jump to
← Back to topic list

mieke_nl

mieke_nl avatar

07-May-2007 06:30
Posts:  1,521

315

There is no Tibet-news thread here anymore, is there?

This looks pretty scandalous: The Brussels Journal, a weblog (in Flemish). ( Altavista automatic translation effort ).

Is some Belgian jerk - excusez le mot - complaining that genocides aren't what we think they were?
The massacre of over 6 million Jews in WW2 a much less issue than people say it was?
The invasion of Tibet didn't cause a very large number of Tibetan lives brutally being killed?
France, Belgium, Holland are truly to blame for making laws that deny people the right to play down genocides?

Jeez....., Belgium. Of cóurse Belgium!
As in the old days: "brood en koffie mee, en zo gauw mogelijk er doorheen"... :-(

jak_dafool

jak_dafool avatar

07-May-2007 18:54
Posts:  1,445

316

Quote

The invasion of Tibet didn't cause a very large number of Tibetan lives brutally being killed?

There's a lot of evidence suggesting 1.2m Tibetans were not killed by the Chinese. As I've not gone through it all I can't comment on it's credibility but people who have no reason to lie or no obvious agenda claim the evidence is credible. That's not to say that the Chinese government hasn't committed atrocities there - they have, just not on the scale that had been believed previously.

And yes, denying the holocaust, while vile, should not be a crime.

mieke_nl

mieke_nl avatar

07-May-2007 19:07
Posts:  1,521

317

I forwarded the whole thing to the US, assuming they wouldn't closely follow the activities of any Belgian weblogger (in Dutch).... Let them go through the credibility, and the way the former head of Free Tibet is quoted in that weblog. I don't know of the numbers of victims; I just loathe anything that starts with "My holocaust is bigger than yours", and then wants to question the credibility of "genocides".
Quote

And yes, denying the holocaust, while vile, should not be a crime.

You're up late. Maybe too late (to be able to still think clear).
Let's discuss the borders of the notion "crime", shall we? Me nor you being of Jewish descent, but imo understanding enough of what it must mean to be in mortal danger just because of your race (looks).

Why, while vile, shouldn't it be a crime these days to actively deny the Holocaust? (i.e. the 1930's up to end of WW2)

jak_dafool

jak_dafool avatar

08-May-2007 02:40
Posts:  1,445

318

Quote

and the way the former head of Free Tibet is quoted in that weblog

Patrick French is known for his opinion on this subject. From Wikipedia:

Quote

According to Patrick French, the estimate of 1.2 million in Tibet is not reliable because Tibetans were not able to process the data well enough to produce a credible total. There were, however, many casualties, with a figure of 400,000 extrapolated from a calculation Warren W. Smith made from census reports of Tibet which show 200,000 "missing" from Tibet. Even The Black Book of Communism expresses doubt at the 1.2 million figure, but does note that according to the Chinese census the total population of ethnic Tibetans in the PRC was 2.8 million in 1953citation needed, but only 2.5 million in 1964. It puts forward a figure of 800,000 deaths and alleges that as many as 10% of Tibetans were interned, with few survivors. Chinese demographers have estimated that 90,000 of the 300,000 "missing" Tibetans fled the region.


A similar doubt also concerns the Pakistani 'genocide' in Bangladesh (mentioned in the Brussels Journal). Personally, while I accept that the situation in Darfur is extremely dreadful and many atrocities have occurred, I don't believe 'genocide' is taking place. I also have doubts over the Pakistani size of the genocide in Bangladesh.

Quote

Why, while vile, shouldn't it be a crime these days to actively deny the Holocaust?

Not really for this thread but since you brought it up.....

Ever hear of freedom of speech? You might not like what someone has to say but they have a right to say it - unless of course you act irresponsibly with the freedom or you live under a dictatorial regime or in a state like Turkey where claiming a genocide did occur is a crime. Let the deniers bring the evidence it didn't happen, let the sane people provide evidence to the contrary and let the rest of us believe which ever side we find most compelling. If someone doesn't believe the Holocaust or some other genocide happened, so what?

jak_dafool

jak_dafool avatar

08-May-2007 02:52
Posts:  1,445

319

I should add that my comments about freedom of speech are further reinforced after having read up about Koenraad Elst, author of that piece on Brussels Journal. Particularly this piece, which you might want to read: Paki Come Home!. He is a repulsive piece of racist shit but he has a right to exercise his freedom of speech, even though I don't agree with him.

jak_dafool

jak_dafool avatar

09-May-2007 04:10
Posts:  1,445

320

Speaking of Belgium.....

Dalai Lama scrubs Belgium trip after Chinese pressure, Tibet activists say
BEIJING: The Dalai Lama is canceling a planned trip to Belgium this week after China pressured Brussels to bar the exiled leader of Tibet, Tibetan activists said Wednesday.
In a statement to be publicly released later Wednesday, the Dalai Lama said he decided not to attend a gathering of Tibetan groups in Brussels on Friday to save Belgium any trouble. The statement — an extract of which was shown to The Associated Press — did not specify the pressure China exerted but connected it to an upcoming China tour by Belgium's crown prince.
"The Belgian government shared with me their predicament on account of pressure from the People's Republic of China," the Dalai Lama's statement said. "Having considered the situation, I have decided not to visit Brussels this time."
Beijing has for years mounted an aggressive lobbying campaign against the Dalai Lama, seeking to deny international legitimacy to the Nobel Peace Prize winner and undermine his enduring popularity in Chinese-controlled Tibet.
Both Russia and South Korea have prohibited the Dalai Lama from even transiting their countries in deference to Beijing.
Like many European countries, Belgium is actively seeking ways to boost trade with the world's fastest-growing large economy, and Crown Prince Philippe is expected to head a 300-member trade delegation to Beijing next week.
The European Union, of which Belgium is a member, is also scheduled to a hold a routine dialogue on human rights with Beijing next week.
Belgium's ambassador to Beijing, Bernard Pierre, declined to confirm that Brussels had come under Chinese pressure and referred inquiries to the Belgian Foreign Ministry. But he said the Dalai Lama's cancellation was expected.
"It is a sovereign decision by the Dalai Lama," Pierre said.
Supporters of the Dalai Lama and critics of China's often harsh rule over Tibet, however, took issue with Belgium for not living up to European standards on human rights.
"It is indefensible that Belgium, a founding member of the European Union, should acquiesce to China in its attempts to silence the Dalai Lama, one of the world's greatest men of peace," Mary Beth Markey of the Washington-based International Campaign for Tibet said in a statement.


Link

mieke_nl

mieke_nl avatar

09-May-2007 04:48
Posts:  1,521

321

Early this morning I heard it in the radionews over here; they were decent enough to add a few words as 'background info' about China attempting to gain ever more influence, worldwide, on what is basically an internal affair in countries. (Such as last year with the World Museum in Rotterdam and its The 14 Dalai Lamas exhibition, and how the Chinese Embassy in the very early stages of preparation already tried to muzzle the museum). But it didn't sound as if our national newsradio needed to consult any Tibetan activists before they made their point in the news today...

You said 'speaking of Belgium' and I thought the same. However, it gets much worse if you consider what an utterly controversial and low respected and often publicly ridiculed person the Belgian crown prince is, throughout the years. And it's not getting any better with the Belgian royals. Which makes this news about the Dalai Lama even a whole lot more embarrassing, imo. I mean, who to bow for? What "Belgian interests" that should prevail when a majority of the Belgians are uncomfortable with their royals nowadays? Why have him officially visit China at all?

It's easy to mislead a Dalai Lama nowadays, I guess...

I have in mind to reply re. genocides, the Holocaust, freedom of speech a little later. Yesterday marked the official 'goodbye' of a remarkable woman: Hadassa Hirschfeld. For a very long time she co-managed CIDI ( www.cidi.nl ), the Centre for Information and Documentation on Israel. An institution based in The Hague that has always had an important influence in Holland. A symposium was held in her honour yesterday, and a.o. things it dealt with exactly the topic we came to discuss here a little: revisionism, genocide, freedom of opinion and speech, and the "deflation" of the notion holocaust.
Of course I already had my own reasons for supporting that public denial of genocides should be punishable. Yesterday's occasion adds some more ammunition to those ideas. The first question to ask, is: why? Why does a growing number of people occupy itself with playing down and denying some parts of the history that surrounds World War II? What is their motivation?

RefDag: „Holocaust is bizar privilege” (in Dutch, today; a national newspaper for rather fundamentalistic Christians. The only online Dutch paper to report about that interesting symposium and a courageous Jewish woman, I'm afraid).

jak_dafool

jak_dafool avatar

09-May-2007 06:34
Posts:  1,445

322

Quote

However, it gets much worse if you consider what an utterly controversial and low respected and often publicly ridiculed person the Belgian crown prince is, throughout the years. And it's not getting any better with the Belgian royals. Which makes this news about the Dalai Lama even a whole lot more embarrassing, imo. I mean, who to bow for? What "Belgian interests" that should prevail when a majority of the Belgians are uncomfortable with their royals nowadays? Why have him officially visit China at all?

It's easy to mislead a Dalai Lama nowadays, I guess...

Reminiscent of the Dalai Lama visiting the UK and the plans to meet, or not as it turned out, Tony Blair - although a member of our royal famil, Prince Charles, welcomed the DL and introduced him at a lecture too. China is an economic player and most states want a piece, so this is a bigger issue than the unpopularity of the royal family. Don't know what you mean about misleading the DL though.

Quote

I have in mind to reply re. genocides, the Holocaust, freedom of speech a little later.

Don't feel obliged to, I'm not really interested in discussing the topic.

jak_dafool

jak_dafool avatar

10-May-2007 10:03
Posts:  1,445

323

Quote

China on Thursday warned other countries against developing close ties with the Dalai Lama, one day after the exiled leader of Tibet cancelled a trip to Belgium.

"We hope relevant parties and countries can keep on high alert for attempts by the Dalai Lama to undermine their relations with China and keep alert to his words and actions to split the motherland," Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Jiang Yu said at a regular news conference.

...

"The Dalai Lama's words and actions in the past decades have fully proved that he is by no means a purely religious figure, but a political exile who has conducted motherland-splitting activities under the camouflage of religion for years," Jiang said.

'Stay away from the Dalai Lama'

mieke_nl

mieke_nl avatar

13-May-2007 16:32
Posts:  1,521

324

A. "Reminiscent of the Dalai Lama visiting ....."
Same happened in Finland, not a kingdom, late last year. Helsingin Sanomat, published ± Oct. 7, 2006.
Relevant: at that time Finland had the "presidency" of the entire European Union. And the incident took place shortly after virtually all the worldmedia had published about Nangpa La.

B. "Prince Charles, welcomed ...."
He better. Becáuse he is a royal, with a different view on how to achieve peace and a different "agenda"! And as you said: he did indeed. A similar thing, though I don't recall by head exactly what year and month, seems to have happened in The Netherlands in recent years, when somehow the Queen suddenly "took over" when politicians left the man standing in the cold (contrary to previously made official arrangements with the TGIE/ the Dalai Lama). Still makes me feel utterly embarrassed...

C. "Don't know what you mean about misleading the DL though."
Well, it's in the official statement of the Tibetan Government in Exile. HH the Dalai Lama doesn't want to cause any trouble for Belgium. That is either a common diplomatic way of putting things, or it's proof of the TGIE not quite understanding the true situation re. the Belgian crown prince et cetera. I opt for the first possibility: the Tibetans know quite well what's up, but they're diplomatic and decent enough to save both Belgium as well as HH any "loss of face" (as I think the expression is).
Yet analysing the official statement from Dharamsala, in my humble opinion you can also read it as a deliberate misleading of the Dalai Lama (re. the political situation in Belgium).

D. "I have in mind to reply re. genocides, the Holocaust, freedom of speech a little later." /
"Don't feel obliged to, I'm not really interested in discussing the topic."
Well I did feel obliged, not only to you but also to "the Jewish people" in general. But some stuff occurred in real life and kept me away from here. However, I can live with leaving that topic alone. But it was interesting to read a long newsarticle about Mrs. Hirschfeld's life. And in particular about how, though both her parents were immediate victims of the Nazi Holocaust in several ways, they made her grow up (they raised her) without any hatred against Germans in general. And that, I'm afraid, is unique over here...

E. "Stay away from the Dalai Lama"
THE NERVE they've got!!!! Tell you what: apart from yourself, would you know of any people young and fit enough to be a "runner" and carry the Olympic torch for the Tibetan Olympics a few miles on its way from Delhi to Dharamsala next year?

Please check this out: www.tibetanolympics.com

I used to be a real and remarkably fast "estafette"-runner a long time ago. But as said: that's a long time ago. But oh boy, do I envy those who'll get the chance ánd the honour to be a genuine "runner" towards Dharamsala for the Tibetan Olympics next year!

Btw: the organisation is still looking for a catchy title song too! Could that be your field, perhaps?
Ever since I learned about their plans (October last year) I've felt it's a superbe idea for (exiled) Tibetans to hold their very own Olympic Games in 2008 (in the Dharamsala region). To coïncide with whatever will take place in Beijing (IOC-granted Olympic Games). There was an e-mail today, saying a.o. "Our planning has bear good fruit" and they'll have an official press conference in a couple of days.
Needless to say here, I guess, that I'll try to offer any kind of support to this Tibetan "mouse" that is in such a very sportive and creative way in fact cursing an elephant! The elephant not only being Beijing/China, as far as I'm concerned, but the whole of the IOC-presidency and its s.c. "respected" board members as well! Virtually no day goes by that one or more (online) media don't report about human rights abuses in China, and how they (the Chinese government) don't at all match the demands of the IOC in connection with granting them the right to organize the 2008-Olympic Games!

Yes, we're a bit off-topic meanwhile.
I have a hunch Ram Bomjon won't really mind.

jak_dafool

jak_dafool avatar

13-May-2007 17:52
Posts:  1,445

325

Quote

Yet analysing the official statement from Dharamsala, in my humble opinion you can also read it as a deliberate misleading of the Dalai Lama (re. the political situation in Belgium).

It's hardly misleading when the DL clearly knows the Chinese policy of making diplomatic threats against states officially welcoming him and thus has a policy of attempting to avoid damaging the relations between China and other states. Also, this is isn't the first time his visit to Belgium has been cancelled, a 2005 trip to was 'rescheduled' in almost exactly the same circumstances.

old_hand

old_hand avatar

13-May-2007 18:15
Posts:  1,404

326

re. # 325 - True, and at the same time unbelievable.
As I recall, last year (early) October the USofA and its ambassador to China stood out for officially criticising China in the aftermath of the Nangpa La shootings (killings). I'm disappointed no nation called for a boycott of the official Olympic Games (yet). Although basically all governments ánd the IOC know very well that China still doesn't meet the general demands to be allowed to organize any Olympic Games. And while we all know so well that money is no ultimate condition and value for beings of flesh and blood to be able to live on, how come we can't beat a former communist (large) nation that is out to own and dictate the world?
Quote

Only when the last tree has died and the last river has been poisoned and the last fish has been caught will we realize we cannot eat money.
-- Chief Seattle (well over a 150 years ago)
Btw"(313):
Quote

Dance monkey, dance!!!!
Care to explain, pls.?
Have you got anything against monkies?
With your background, would a monkey and a female (human) be just about the same thing?
Not kidding.

Sorry...; first time I really did bother to read (current) reply # 313.
Quote

(# 316)
And yes, denying the holocaust, while vile, should not be a crime.
Yes it should.
Go try figuring out pls. what it means in real life if some stuff / certain stuff - due to the ways it's being reported and described - becomes no longer objectionable. But (slowly) accepted instead. As if it's a novelty that comes with modern times, unavoidable. Figure out anything: pedosexuals, child abuse, child abductions, late abortions, warfare, sexism, honour killings, (genital) mutilations, racist inspired (mass) prosecutions and/or killings (such as f.e. with the Ku Klux Klan), poverty, lack of education, socialism, capitalism, liberalism, humanism, and so on.

It's a psychological thing. Maybe because (nature's law!) a majority of human beings are like true sheeple / cattle: following any mainstream behaviour, never asking questions. Too dumb, or too coward.
I know from many very personal experiences that the (Jewish, Nazi) Holocaust did happen (heard enough about it from victims, and from eye witnesses such as my own parents). It was sheer racism, and nothing else. WHY allow members of later generations to deny a vital (and frightening) ongoing FACT in the history of mankind? (Ongoing, because the Jewish diaspora is one, big, book of prejudice, xenofobia, dislike and racism throughout almost 20 centuries). Anti-semitism. Bearing in mind that all of the peoples originating from that region, but not belonging to the same race, have nevertheless always shared being "Semitic".

jak_dafool

jak_dafool avatar

13-May-2007 18:40
Posts:  1,445

327

Quote

I'm disappointed no nation called for a boycott of the official Olympic Games (yet).

If no nations (as far as I can recall) actually boycotted the 1936 Berlin Games (despite the discussion) what are the chances they'll boycott the 2008 Beijing Games?

jak_dafool

jak_dafool avatar

15-May-2007 02:27
Posts:  1,445

328

Pretty much the point I was making in post #295 is made by a journalist in today's Independent, only far more eloquently....

Quote

And that is where the Chinese have presented the Tibetans with a grave dilemma. The Dalai Lama is number one in the Tibetan religious hierarchy; number two is the Panchen Lama. It is the Dalai Lama's job to help identify, with the help of dreams and visions, the newly reincarnated Panchen Lama; and vice versa, so the hierarchy of reincarnated religious leaders leapfrogs down the ages. By abducting the newly identified Panchen Lama in 1995, and keeping his whereabouts secret ever since, the Chinese attempted to hijack this process; the puppet Panchen Lama they appointed in his place is duly expected to name a puppet Dalai Lama, once Tenzin Gyatso dies, and the People's Republic will then have the whole arcane system in its pocket.

Things might not go so smoothly for them, however. The Dalai Lama himself has said clearly that, owing to the oppressive conditions prevalent in Tibet, he expects his own reincarnation to appear outside, among the exiles. There remains of course the problem of who will identify him. "The absence of the Panchen Lama is one of the areas of anxiety in the Tibetan community," conceded Yael Weisz-Rind. "The Chinese are aware of this, and that's probably why the Panchen Lama was abducted."

But all is not lost. Another high lama is coming to ripeness just as the Dalai Lama prepares to leave the stage. Third in the hierarchy after the Dalai and Panchen Lamas, the 17th Karmapa Lama is unique in that he is recognised by the Chinese and the Dalai Lama. And, although he was believed by many in the Tibetan community to have come unhealthily under Chinese influence in his childhood, he redeemed himself dramatically in 1999 when he fled as a young teenager with a few companions from Tsurphu monastery and travelled hundreds of miles along unmarked tracks to avoid detection before turning up in Dharamsala.

This "Black Hat Lama", Ogyen Trinley Dorje, has not established a reputation in the West because Delhi has not yet allowed him to leave India. But his supporters in Dharamsala believe it won't be long before that happens. "He turns 22 next month, he now speaks six languages, and he's becoming more and more of a magnet here," said Jane Perkins, author of Tibet in Exile, from Dharamsala. "Even mainland Chinese are coming over to hear him speak, 90 came to his last appearance in southern India. There's absolutely no doubt that he is the new star: dynamic, powerful, full of young energy but with tremendous discipline and dignity, enormously sage for his age. We hope he will be free to go overseas soon. In which case he could take some of the load off His Holiness's shoulders."

She added as an afterthought: "Every teenage girl is in love with him..." And that's something not even Tenzin Gyatso can claim.

Life after the Dalai Lama


jak_dafool

jak_dafool avatar

28-May-2007 01:19
Posts:  1,445

329

Quote

I'm disappointed no nation called for a boycott of the official Olympic Games (yet).


China's human rights record and its authoritarian regime are disturbing to many Americans, but calls for the United States to boycott the Beijing Olympics next summer in protest remain in the minority.

The UPI/Zogby poll of more than 5,000 Americans, weighted to make it representative of the country as a whole, found that even though more than 46 percent do not expect China to make any changes in its human rights policies as a result of hosting the Olympics, a resounding 78 percent of respondents said the United States should not boycott the summer games in protest.

Meanwhile, nearly 39 percent "strongly disagreed" with the idea that U.S. participation in the Beijing Olympics would validate Chinese government policies, while about 34 percent "somewhat disagreed" with the statement. Moreover, 33 percent said they were "somewhat favorable" towards the International Olympic Committee's decision to award the 2008 summer games to Beijing, with nearly 12 percent stating that they were "very favorable" about the outcome.

Little chance for U.S. boycott of Beijing Olympics
← Back to topic list
 
ADVERTISEMENT

In our shop

Hotels & Hostels

See all hotels & hostels