4 nights to spend
Which do you recommend?Luang Prabang, Laos
Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
Hanoi, Vietnam
I am a backpacker and will be staying in hostels and have never been to Vietnam or Laos. I am 28. I enjoy sights more than partying, but like grabbing beers at night. I will be flying in to one or the other. I am a photography nerd and like taking pictures of just about anything. I would prefer having things to do each day and seeing some things of historic/cultural value. I would like clean places to stay with private rooms, but some atmosphere and other travelers.
It is between those three places due to flight restrictions. Which do you recommend? I have been to most other places in SE Asia also, which is why it is down to those.
3
I tend to agree with #2 bun_cha, with four nights to spend, you may not have the variety in Luang Prabang, and I prefer Hanoi over HCMC. Yep my vote for four nights in Hanoi.4
I prefer Hanoit to HCMC, but as a photographer, I loved Luang Prabang and spent three nights there in December. It is extremely pretty, with two rivers on either side of the old town, plus loads of architecturally interesting houses. When we were there it was very atmospheric with low cloud hanging around till about 10am, which then lifted and then sun for most of the day, until the low cloud again early evening - wonderful for arty photographs. You can take boat trips there, visit elephant sanctuaries, if you're so inclined, the several temples and museum but it was also buzzy with people of all ages. Every moring at about firstlight, all the monks walk along the street to collect food donations and we got some fabulous photos of them too.We stayed in a guesthouse on the Mekong for roughly $35 a night, which I can recommend, but would have to look up what it was called.

