go to content go to search box go to global site navigation

Thorn Tree Forum

Why are people so cruel ?

Replies: 54 - Last Post: Apr 27, 2012 1:54 PM Last Post By: Donkeystone

jump to
← Back to topic list

sashac001

sashac001 avatar

Apr 13, 2012 5:55 PM
Posts:  8,298

45

Anywayyyy, back to the topic at hand - aabain, not all Indian food is highly spiced without the flavor of the meats/veggies. I've had tandoori dishes in which one can taste the flavor of the meat and my favorite dish - beef saag maintains the flavor of both the spinach or mustard greens and the beef.

tony0001

tony0001 avatar

Apr 15, 2012 10:05 AM
Posts:  2,426

46

aabain, not all Indian food is highly spiced

I agree entirely, sashac - I have often thought that, whilst Indian food may be highly spiced and/or hot, people often miss the fact that it is often very subtle.

Of course, people in/from India know this - indeed, they taught me this a few decades ago. Also, the term 'Indian food' is, in a way, ridiculous: there is so much variation, it would be like calling, say, Spanish food 'European' and assuming that, say, French food was like that of Spain.

bandraboy

bandraboy avatar

Apr 15, 2012 5:46 PM
Posts:  759

47

Also, the term 'Indian food' is, in a way, ridiculous

I disagree-there is clearly an identifiable style of cooking in the sub-continent as there is an identifiable style of cooking in Europe. And the sub-continent is the Indian sub-continent so despite political boundaries it is right to talk about Indian food.

tony0001

tony0001 avatar

Apr 17, 2012 5:37 AM
Posts:  2,426

48

Fair point.

Fieldgate

Fieldgate avatar

Apr 18, 2012 2:40 AM
Posts:  2,814

49

so despite political boundaries it is right to talk about Indian food.

Especially, if you consider that curries are part of Britain's national cuisine.
I hear that chicken tikka masala is a dish that has been invented in Glasgow. A couple of other UK cities claim that title too.

tony0001

tony0001 avatar

Apr 18, 2012 3:09 AM
Posts:  2,426

50

Chicken tikka masala replaced fish'n'chips as Britain's national dish about 20 years ago.

battybilly

battybilly avatar

Apr 18, 2012 3:30 AM
Posts:  12,228

51

How dare it.

Donkeystone

Donkeystone avatar

Apr 18, 2012 6:11 AM
Posts:  841

52

The gravy was put with the tandoori chicken because the British couldn't cope with having nothing to mop up, of course this was in the days before barbecues existed, at least in Britain.

nautilus

nautilus avatar

Apr 26, 2012 5:53 PM
Posts:  102

53

Tony0001, exactly! I made the same comment in post #12... "Saying you don't like Indian food is like saying "I don't like European food"' Actually, Eurasia is a continent so how about saying "I don't like Eurasian food"?

Bandraboy, is there really AN "identifiable style of cooking" in Europe? (emphasis on the singular here)

Also, regarding "curry" - from Wikipedia: "Curry powder, and the contemporary English use of the word curry are Western inventions and do not reflect any specific Indian food..." and "Curry is a generic term primarily employed in Western culture to denote a wide variety of dishes originating in Indian, Pakistani, Bangladeshi, Sri Lankan, Thai or other Southeast Asian cuisines."

Donkeystone

Donkeystone avatar

Apr 27, 2012 1:54 PM
Posts:  841

54

Didn't you read the etymology, Curry was adopted and anglicised from the Tamil word Kari, meaning sauce.
← Back to topic list
ADVERTISEMENT

In our shop

See all shop products

Hotels & Hostels

See all hotels & hostels