Travel Tips
When short on time, should one indulge in leisure travelling, or should one try and cover as much as possible?
About this group
- Members: 194
- Join Policy: Anyone can view, Open to anyone
- Messages: 61
- Photos: 14
Answer questions, ask questions. It is all about learning about other travellers, and expressing the what, where, how, and why of your travel history.
Advertisement
skullmiles we believe in leisure. We have gone the "cover as much as possible", and its too much rushing. Too tiring. You can't enjoy the present. Leisure is good, you can always return to see more
markbroadhead I don't rush things, but I wouldn't call it leisure travel. It is hard to absorb everything fully. I prefer to go deeper on fewer things.
wishful74 i guess it depends on your priorities. i went to thailand on a package tour. Four days and 3 nights and I say we covered a number of toursits spots but boy it was really tiring. plus, you dont get to enjoy the place. the scene, the people, the experience just pass you by. then malaysia for a week trip...no plans, no itineraries....just a map and some brochures. we didn't get to see a lot of places but we're more relaxed. we got to talk to locals more and just enjoyed the place.
cjindc Agreed with wishful74, depends on priorities. Me though, I never keep with me the sites that I see or the ground that I cover nearly as much as the stationary times when I'm able to connect with people.